fbpx

Trademark distinctiveness is the benchmark by which we determine if a trademark is strong. Trademarks play a crucial role in the world of business, serving as distinctive identifiers for brands and their products or services. However, not all trademarks are created equal. They fall into different categories based on their distinctiveness: fanciful, arbitrary, suggestive, and descriptive. Understanding these categories helps businesses navigate the complexities of trademark law and effectively protect their brand identity.

Fanciful and Arbitrary Trademarks: The Strongest Links

Fanciful trademarks are coined terms or phrases with no prior meaning, like “Pepsi” or “TiVo.” These marks are inherently distinctive and easily protectable. They are designated as the strongest trademarks. Similarly, arbitrary trademarks utilize common words in a way unrelated to their usual context, such as “Apple” for computers or “Domino’s” for pizza. These marks, while more common, remain strong candidates for trademark protection due to their distinct use.

Suggestive Trademarks: Walking a Fine Line

Suggestive trademarks hint at the nature or quality of the product without directly describing it. Examples include “Tide” for detergent or “Coppertone” for sunscreen. While suggestive marks are protectable, they often face challenges in litigation, as seen in the case of Zatarain’s v. Oak Grove Smokehouse. Here, the court decided that while “Fish-Fri” had acquired secondary meaning in New Orleans, “Chick-Fri” did not, highlighting the challenges suggestive marks may face in gaining legal protection.

Descriptive Trademarks: Treading Carefully

Descriptive trademarks directly convey a quality or feature of the product, like “Quick Print & Copy” or “Raisin Nut Bran.” These marks are the most challenging to protect. They can only be registered if they acquire secondary meaning, proving that consumers associate the mark with a particular source. The case of Park ‘N Fly v. Dollar Park and Fly illustrates the legal hurdles descriptive marks face; however, once a mark gains incontestable status, it becomes stronger against cancellation attempts.

In trademark law, the distinctiveness of a mark significantly impacts its protectability. Brands should aim for fanciful, arbitrary, or suggestive marks to ensure robust legal protection and avoid the pitfalls associated with descriptive marks. Understanding these nuances can help businesses make informed decisions in building and safeguarding their brand identity.

Francine D. Ward
Attorney-at-Law, Author, Speaker

Follow Francine:

Don’t miss Francine’s Latest Blogs:

Skip to content